Letter to Regulators: AFR Supports SEC Proposal to Restrict Derivatives Use at Mutual Funds

“… for many years the SEC did not sufficiently address the ways in which Investment Company Act restrictions can be violated through the use of derivatives. The SEC’s basic approach to derivatives risk at funds was set out in a series of releases and no-action letters between 1979 and the late 1980s. The fundamental approach adopted at that time was based on ‘offsetting’ or ‘coverage’ – that is, if a fund segregates assets deemed sufficient to ‘cover’ a derivatives risk, or an offsetting derivatives exposure, then derivatives usage would not violate ’40 Act limitations.”

Read more
Letter to Regulators: Regulators Must Not Weaken Dodd-Frank Regulations in the Regulatory Review Process

“On behalf of Americans for Financial Reform, we are writing with regard to your current review of bank safety and soundness rules under the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 (EGRPRA) Notice #4 (December 23, 2015)… Reviewing these rules before they are finalized and while the process of implementation is still ongoing also carries the risk that the burden of implementation will be mistaken for the permanent effects of the rule.”

Read more
Letter to Regulators: Doing Better by Mortgage Applicants Who Are Not Fluent in English

“Allowing mortgage applicants to choose in which language they are most comfortable in communicating addresses a major problem of lenders and servicers working with limited English proficiency (LEP) populations and collecting this information through the URLA is the most comprehensive way to do so, because every mortgage borrower fills one out.”

Read more
Letter to Regulators: AFR Urges Federal Reserve and FDIC to Take Opportunity to End Too Big to Fail

“AFR sent a letter to banking regulators today concerning their review of bank resolution plans. The Dodd-Frank Act requires regulators to review these plans to ensure that major banks are no longer ‘too big to fail’ – that they can go through a conventional (Chapter 11) private bankruptcy in an orderly manner, without creating substantial economic disruption. “

Read more
Letter to Regulators: AFR, 34 Orgs Press for Automatic Relief to Groups of Students Victimized by Predatory Practices

“We are deeply concerned by the slow pace and small number of discharges that have been processed and that many of the Department’s proposals in the current negotiated rulemaking process move in the wrong direction, reducing eligibility for relief, pitting students against schools, and creating unnecessary burdens on students and the Department.”

Read more
Letter to Regulators: AFR, 50 Orgs Suggest Improvements to Dept of ED’s Proposed Complaint System

“As advocates for students, consumers, veterans, faculty and staff, civil rights and college access, we believe the systematic tracking and reporting of student and borrower complaints is essential to providing quality customer service, ensuring college and loan servicer and collector accountability, and preventing waste, fraud, and abuse of taxpayer dollars.”

Read more
Letter to Regulators: AFR Supports International Insurance Regulators in Targeting Activities that Create Systemic Risk

“Americans for Financial Reform (“AFR”) appreciates this opportunity to comment Public Consultation on Non-Traditional Non-Insurance Activities and Products (the ‘Consultation’) by the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (the “IAIS”). We believe that improvements in insurance company regulation are necessary to address such systemic risks. “

Read more
Letter to Regulators:AFR Submits Comment on the De Minimis Exception to CFTC’s Swap Dealer Registration Threshold

“We commend the Commission and the Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight staff for their work in compiling this Preliminary Report. We believe that the Commission should continue on the path laid out in the final rule and reduce the de minimis threshold to $3 billion after the $8 billion phase-in threshold terminates on December 31, 2017. We do not see sufficient evidence in the report to justify either maintaining the current level, or increasing it.”

Read more